E = mc2
Understanding Democracy through the Eyes of Self-Governance
escrito por Dini Harmita
It’s interesting to acknowledge that the word ‘secular’ is also used to define the left wings of Christianity including Catholic Rome (Zulyak and Klish, 2021), not only Islam. Zulyak and Klish (2021) analysed it by criticising how Ukrainians were often not discussed in the articles related to the Christianity governances especially in Galicia and Krakow when they were actually part of the entities, including the monarchies.
Most of time we are tightened by the unspoken rule where our point of view or knowledge, affective, and actions always represent our ideologies; especially when our theories or opinions tend to be true. That’s why somehow indeed we tend to be suggested to listen to the messages. Those who deliver the messages are important, nonetheless the messages themselves are not less essential than. Especially since rarely to always have ‘always’ in our life.
Nieto-Romero et al (2023) beautifully discussed democracy in the forest commoning in Galicia as a direct or radical democracy. Interestingly it’s related more with the ethnicity than the ideologies. Nevertheless, at the beginning they stil differed the participation when it’s actually part of democracy, as they stated in the conclusion.
Democracy tends to be also seen as noble and civil society as vice versa; when actually -like other associations, organisations, institutions, and or entities- the civil societies are part of the democracy too. It may have something to do with the roles of the monarchies in guarding the democracy; thus it’s called as noble.
It reminds me of a Twitter post few days ago somehow; when it told us about governance downgrading from monarchies to terrorists. Despite the facts that the post is valid or not, hoax or not, scientific or not, made by Putin et al or not, it confirms even more Ostrom’s theory that challenges the game theory and also used by Nieto-Romero et al (2023) to explain how the community could govern themselves. Even planting trees could be part of the democratisation process when it’s developed with participation. The question of to which extent is still there but at least they defined it as communities taking part in choosing and controlling for their well-being. Big probability it has something to do with dignity too; regardless the individuals are ‘secular’ or not.
What’s the lesson learned? Representative democracy has participation in the forms of voting. Deliberative democracy has participation in the forms of policies. Participatory democracy sounds equal and or subsetting with direct democracy. Every democracy has the element of participation therefore it’s called as democracy.
Stephen Hawking doesn’t actually need to develop theory of everything. None of us is necessary to; because we could use Einstein’s E=mc2. All we need to do is to derive from it.
What do you think? Still very raw indeed but as it helps us con nos 📚; hopefully it helps and inspires the wider universe tamén, as it tends to be right grandpaaaaaaaaaa 😘.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year de novo, especialmente for those who celebrate.
Love,
grandma 🤍
| PS: I want to see the smiles in the eyes of nos siblings tamén, please, dear God e universe; please love them like you love us tamén |
